SynthesisJournal of global health2024
Systematic review of the quality of care provided to sick children in Ethiopian health facilities.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strengthening implementation of integrated care for small and nutritionally at-risk infants under six months and their mothers: Pre-trial feasibility study.Maternal & child nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing number of primary studies on the quality of health care for sick children in Ethiopia, the findings have not been systematically synthesised to inform quality improvement in policies or strategies. This systematic review provides a narrative synthesis of published evidence on the quality of care provided to sick children in Ethiopia's health facilities and on related barriers and enablers. Methods: We searched studies that measured the structure, process, and outcome measures of quality of care as proposed by Donabedian's framework. We searched in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science using the Population, Concept, and Context (PCC) framework. Grey literature was searched in Google Scholar and institutional websites. We appraised the studies' quality using the Mixed Method Quality Appraisal Tool version 2018. Data were analysed using content thematic analysis and presented using a narrative approach. Results: We included 36 of 701 studies. Thirty (83.3%) were nonexperimental including 21 (70%) cross-sectional studies and five (16.7%) qualitative studies. Of the 31 facility-based studies, 29 (93.5%) were conducted in public facilities. The structural, technical, and interpersonal processes of care were low quality. While some studies reported the effectiveness of interventions in reducing child mortality, the uptake of services and providers' and caretakers' experiences were suboptimal. The major structural barriers to providing quality care included inadequacy of essential drugs, supplies and equipment, training, clinical guidelines, and ambulance services. Caretakers' non-compliance to referral advice was a common demand-side barrier. The enabling factors were implementing various health system strengthening interventions including quality improvement strategies such as user-centred service delivery and optimising engagement of community-level structures such as health promotors and religious leaders to create demand. Conclusions: The quality of care provided to sick children in health facilities is generally low in Ethiopia. Shortages of essential drugs, supplies and equipment, physical space, water, and electricity; and human resource-related challenges such as shortage, training, supervision, and retention were common structural barriers. Various health systems strengthening and quality improvement interventions, ranging from enhanced demand creation to realising a reliable and consumer-centred service delivery were key enablers. More research is needed on the quality of care provided in private facilities. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42021285064.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.