Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39480520›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

"I'm not the one with cancer but it's affecting me just as much": A qualitative study of rural caregivers' experiences seeking and accessing support for their health and wellbeing while caring for someone with cancer.

Elizabeth A Johnston, Katelyn E Collins, Jazmin N Vicario, Chris Sibthorpe, Belinda C Goodwin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth A JohnstonViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia. e23.johnston@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9486-5704
Katelyn E CollinsViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Jazmin N VicarioViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Chris SibthorpeViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Belinda C GoodwinViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCaregivers provide vital support to people with cancer but often report feeling unsupported themselves. This study investigated rural caregivers' experiences seeking support for their health and wellbeing while caring for someone with cancer.

methodsThrough semi-structured interviews, 20 rural caregivers described their experiences seeking and accessing support for their own health and wellbeing while caring for someone with cancer, including what support was, or would have been, helpful. Interview transcripts were analysed using content analysis to identify the type and source of support sought and what aspects of the support were helpful or unhelpful.

resultsHealth and wellbeing support was sought across medical and psychosocial domains. Caregivers' responses reflected both facilitators and barriers to support-seeking and benefits and challenges of accessing support. Facilitators to support-seeking included telehealth options and being involved in patient care discussions, as this helped caregivers know what to expect in their role. Barriers included social isolation while travelling for treatment and caregivers' needs for support not being acknowledged or understood by medical staff or social networks. Benefits of accessing support included help with managing daily responsibilities and being linked with additional services. Challenges included delays in receiving support, inadequate duration of support, and lack of lived experience among care providers.

conclusionsTo optimise rural caregivers' access to support for their health and wellbeing, support services should be prompt and flexible in delivery, simple to navigate, integrated with patient care, improve caregivers' coping ability, provide access to additional supports, and reduce caregiver burden.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSocial SupportAdultAgedFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedCaregiversOncologyQualitative researchRegional and remoteSupportive care

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.