Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39482393›Full record

Trial reportIrish journal of medical science2025

Comparison of anti-gravity treadmill training and traditional treadmill training in patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.

Tuğba Atan, Yunus Emre Bildik, Yasin Demir, Ümüt Güzelküçük, Arif Kenan Tan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05319964 (Comparison of Anti-gravity Treadmill Training and Traditional Treadmill Training in Patients With Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05319964 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Anti-gravity Treadmill Training and Traditional Treadmill Training in Patients With Moderate to Severe Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsAnti-gravity treadmill, Conventional treadmill, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tuğba AtanUniversity of Health Sciences, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye. tubaatan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1229-8679
Yunus Emre BildikUniversity of Health Sciences, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yasin DemirUniversity of Health Sciences, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ümüt GüzelküçükUniversity of Health Sciences, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Arif Kenan TanUniversity of Health Sciences, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAerobic exercise is recommended to alleviate pain and protect the joint for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis, however, its clinical implementation is challenging due to the potential for exacerbating pain.

aimsThe study aimed to compare the effects of anti-gravity treadmill training with traditional treadmill training in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis.

methodsThis single-blinded randomized-controlled trial included 30 women with knee osteoarthritis. All participants received hotpack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and therapeutic ultrasound. Additionally, group 1 received anti-gravity treadmill, while group 2 received traditional treadmill training. Group 3 served as the control. The interventions were administered three-times a week for eight-weeks. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), six-minute-walk-test distance (6MWD), and femoral cartilage thickness were evaluated at baseline and weeks 4 and 8.

resultsVAS-pain significantly reduced over time in both anti-gravity (P < 0.001) and control (P = 0.004) groups. The anti-gravity group also showed significant improvements in WOMAC-pain (P = 0.008), WOMAC-total (P = 0.048), and 6MWD (P < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis indicated significant time (P < 0.001, effect size, ηp2 = 0.682) and interaction (P = 0.006, ηp2 = 0.271) effects on VAS, with no significant between-group differences. Femoral cartilage thickness showed no significant between-group differences, except within-group differences in the treadmill group (P = 0.037).

conclusionsAnti-gravity treadmill training significantly improved pain, functionality, and functional capacity in patients with knee osteoarthritis, while traditional treadmill resulted in a reduction in femoral cartilage thickness. Further research should investigate long-term outcomes and more diverse populations. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT05319964.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAerobic exerciseAnti-gravity treadmillKnee osteoarthritisPain

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.