ArticleEJNMMI reports2024
Mapping the evolution of PET/MR research: a bibliometric analysis of publication trends, leading contributors, and conceptual frameworks (2011-2023).
Article in EJNMMI reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric Analysis of Whole-Body MRI from 2015 to 2025 Across Clinical Applications, Quantitative Imaging, and Artificial Intelligence.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- The Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPositron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) is a cutting-edge hybrid imaging technology with the potential to revolutionize medical diagnosis. This bibliometric study aims to map the research landscape of PET/MR by analyzing a curated set of Web of Science Core Collection documents from 2011 to 2023.
methodsWe conducted a bibliometric analysis to map the research landscape of PET/MR, leveraging a curated dataset of 3,600 documents retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection spanning the period from 2011 to 2023. We employed quantitative methods to assess the quantity and distribution of PET/MR studies, including patterns of change, research status, and directions. Additionally, we utilized VOSviewer software to conduct keyword co-occurrence analysis, explore collaborative networks among authors and institutions, and identify influential journals in the field.
resultsResults: The analysis reveals several key insights: (1) a significant increase in the number of PET/MR publications over the past 12 years, highlighting the growing interest and activity in this field; (2) the United States and Germany as the leading countries in terms of research output and collaboration, with a growing presence of other countries such as China; (3) the Journal of Nuclear Medicine and the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging as the most influential journals in the field; (4) a shift in research focus from imaging techniques to clinical applications, with an increasing emphasis on prostate cancer, PSMA, and FDG imaging.
conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive overview of PET/MR research, identifying prominent trends, key researchers, and influential works. Based on these findings, we propose recommendations for future research directions in this rapidly evolving field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.