ArticleBMC cancer2024
Efficacy and safety of surufatinib in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumor: a real-world study in Chinese population.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world application of surufatinib in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: a multi-center retrospective study in China.European journal of medical research · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms that originate from peptidergic neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Due to their increasing incidence, effective treatment strategies are required. Surufatinib, a novel small-molecule inhibitor with antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory effects, has shown promise in clinical trials for advanced NETs. However, the efficacy and safety of surufatinib are influenced by multiple factors, and there is currently a lack of sufficient real-world studies to explore these potential influencing factors.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study on 133 patients with NETs who were treated with surufatinib at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Patients were histologically confirmed to have primary NETs. Statistical analyses, including Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves, were conducted to assess the impact of the primary tumor site on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsPatients with gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs) exhibited significantly longer PFS and OS compared to extraGEP-NETs patients. Subgroup analyses also revealed variations in survival outcomes among patients with liver metastases depending on the primary tumor site. Adverse events (AEs), including proteinuria and increased bilirubin, were more common in GEP-NETs patients. These findings emphasize the importance of considering primary tumor site in treatment decisions for NETs.
conclusionsPrimary tumor site is a critical factor influencing the efficacy of surufatinib in NETs. Clinicians should consider this factor when determining treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.