ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2024
Development and validation of a 6-gene signature derived from RNA modification-associated genes for the diagnosis of Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.
Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential TET1/2/3 Protein Expression in Circulating Leukocytes of Statin-Treated Patients with HFrEF.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Key gene screening and diagnostic model establishment for acute type a aortic dissection.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) is a critical medical emergency characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to identify specific gene expression patterns and RNA modification associated with ATAAD. Methods: The GSE153434 dataset was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differential expression analysis was conducted to identify differential expression genes (DEGs) associated with ATAAD. To validate the involvement of RNA modification in ATAAD, RNA modification-related genes (M6A, M1A, M5C, APA, A-to-I) were acquired from GeneCards, following by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis. A gene prediction signature consisting of key genes was established, and Real-time PCR was used to validate the gene expression in clinical samples. The patients were then divided into high and low-risk groups, and subsequent enrichment analysis, including Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), and assessments of immune infiltration. A co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to explore gene-phenotype relationships and identify key genes. Results: A total of 45 RNA modification genes were acquired. Six gene signatures (YTHDC1, WTAP, CFI, ADARB1, ADARB2, TET3) were developed for ATAAD diagnosis and risk stratification. Enrichment analysis suggested the potential involvement of inflammation and extracellular matrix pathways in the progression of ATAAD. The incorporation of pertinent genes from the GSE147026 dataset into the six-gene signature further validated the model's effectiveness. A significant upregulation in WTAP, ADARB2, and TET3 expression, whereas YTHDC1 exhibited a noteworthy downregulation in the ATAAD group. Conclusion: Six-gene signature could serve as an efficient model for predicting the diagnosis of ATAAD.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.