Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483285›Full record

ArticleNeuroSci2024

The Intersection of Ultra-Processed Foods, Neuropsychiatric Disorders, and Neurolaw: Implications for Criminal Justice.

Susan L Prescott, Kathleen F Holton, Christopher A Lowry, Jeffrey J Nicholson, Alan C Logan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroSci, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Susan L PrescottNova Institute for Health, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; susan.prescott@uwa.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-8590
Kathleen F HoltonDepartments of Health Studies and Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA; holton@american.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-7983
Christopher A LowryDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, and Center for Microbial Exploration, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; christopher.lowry@colorado.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-5575
Jeffrey J NicholsonLaw and Government, Humber College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning, Toronto, ON M9W 5L7, Canada; jeffrey.nicholson@humber.ca.
Alan C LoganNova Institute for Health, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; susan.prescott@uwa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade there has been increasing interest in the links between the consumption of ultra-processed foods and various neuropsychiatric disorders, aggression, and antisocial behavior. Neurolaw is an interdisciplinary field that seeks to translate the rapid and voluminous advances in brain science into legal decisions and policy. An enhanced understanding of biophysiological mechanisms by which ultra-processed foods influence brain and behavior allows for a historical reexamination of one of forensic neuropsychiatry's most famous cases-

Indexed as

aggressionauto-brewery syndromebehaviorbrain fogmental healthmicrobiomemonosodium glutamateneurolawultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID39483285
PMCPMC11477939

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.