Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483316›Full record

ArticleNeuroSci2023

"I Feel Like I Work Full-Time for Parkinson's": A Longitudinal Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the Experiences of Parkinson's Informal Caregivers during COVID-19 in England.

Ian W Garner, Craig D Murray, Fiona J R Eccles, Nicolò Zarotti, Jane Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroSci, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian W GarnerDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.
Craig D MurrayDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.
Fiona J R EcclesDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-2703
Nicolò ZarottiDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-6151
Jane SimpsonDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the direct effects of COVID-19 caused widespread global suffering and death, the indirect impacts-via public health preventative measures and a reduction in health and social care services-were also devastating for many. More recently, it has also become increasingly apparent that such measures have had disproportionate effects, exacerbating existing health inequalities. For caregivers of individuals with chronic illness, the effects have been marked and particularly so for informal caregivers of individuals with complex neurodegenerative conditions such as Parkinson's. Nine informal caregivers (all partners: three men and six women) of individuals with Parkinson's in England took part in individual semi-structured interviews on two occasions (December 2021/January 2022 and May 2022). The interviews focused on their experiences of supporting their partner, their own challenges, and how these evolved and changed post-lockdown. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to inform the methodology and analysis. Four themes were identified: (i) lockdown-induced revolution and evolution of the relationship dynamic with partner; (ii) fighting to be seen, heard, and understood in healthcare encounters; (iii) making sense of, and adapting to, risk in a time of COVID-19; and (iv) managing isolation and need for support during and after lockdown. The negative effects from both the lockdowns and the depletion of usual health and support services were apparent for all participants. Existing vulnerabilities from being a carer of an individual with complex needs were also exacerbated. As caregivers worked hard to mitigate these effects for their partners as much as possible, the long-term impact of such intense psychological and practical effort was often considerable. Ultimately, a simple restoration of pre-lockdown support levels may be insufficient to facilitate a successful return to optimal levels of support and wellbeing.

Indexed as

caregiversCOVID-19interpretative phenomenological analysislongitudinalParkinson’s

Identifiers

PMID39483316
PMCPMC11523693

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.