ReviewNeuroSci2022
Non-Pharmacological Treatments of Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review.
Review in NeuroSci, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effects of Coffee/Caffeine in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis; A Systematic Review.Journal of evidence-based integrative medicinePooled it
- Assessment of cognitive-motor functions in adults with perceived neuropsychological problems using NIH toolbox after remote biofield energy treatment as non-pharmacological intervention: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2024Trial
- Reconsidering Rehabilitation and Lifestyle Approaches to Improve Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Review
- Prevalence of Stroke in Spain and Its Impact on Quality of Life: Socioeconomic Inequalities and Access to Rehabilitation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Role of the Cerebellum in Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue and Disability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Hashimoto's Encephalopathy: Clinical Features, Therapeutic Strategies, and Rehabilitation Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Eye-Tracking Metrics as a Digital Biomarker for Neurocognitive Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Dynamic Cognitive-Motor Training versus Cognitive Computer-Based Training in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial with 2-Month Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment (CI) represents a common symptom in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS), which can affect every stage of the disease course. Recent studies seem to support cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for minimizing the CI consequences. We reviewed the currently available evidence on the non-pharmacological approaches to CI, with the aim of giving an overview of the treatments used worldwide, from the traditional methods to the most recent techniques. A search of the literature was conducted on PubMed (articles in English performed in the last five years on humans). A total of 37 articles met our eligibility criteria after screening titles, abstracts and full-text and were divided into three main groups: in-presence interventions; studies performed via tele-rehabilitation and miscellaneous. Despite the great heterogeneity of the intervention and assessment methods, the evidence suggests that a non-pharmacological approach can improve MS-related CI. Cognitive rehabilitation seems effective and well established, as well as the use of computerized CR having the benefit of being even more appealing. Limited conclusions can be drawn on group CR due to the small number of studies focused on this kind of intervention. Some of the innovative approaches (virtual reality, EEG-based neurofeedback, brain stimulation, exercise, diet modification) may play a role in future studies and should be deeply explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.