ReviewCureus2024
Harnessing Epigenetic Mechanisms to Overcome Immune Evasion in Cancer: The Current Strategies and Future Directions.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Insights and Novel Therapies for Lymphoproliferative Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multi-omics analysis of NEDD1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: biological function, prognostic value, and clinical significance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Linavonkibart and pembrolizumab in immune checkpoint blockade-resistant advanced solid tumors: a phase 1 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- The tumor microenvironment: a dynamic ecosystem and therapeutic nexus in modern oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Epigenetic Modulation of Immunity: Mechanisms, Implications, and Emerging Therapeutic Horizons; a Step Toward Epigenetics to Precision.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Current Research in Drug-Free Cancer Therapies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combining epigenetic alterations with cancer immunotherapy offers a promising approach to improve therapeutic outcomes by targeting the complex biology of tumors. Epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) play a dual role in maintaining immune homeostasis and promoting cancer progression. Changes like hypomethylation in tumor cells can contribute to immune evasion and treatment resistance. Advances in epigenetic tools, particularly clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) and their associated protein (Cas9)-based epigenetic editing, allow for precise gene expression control, opening new avenues for research and therapy. The improved accuracy of CRISPR/dCas9 systems, when paired with appropriate delivery methods such as viral vectors or nanoparticles, has facilitated innovative combination therapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors and epigenetic drugs. These combinations enhance the immune system's ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells. Despite these advancements, challenges like off-target effects, delivery issues, and resistance remain. Current research is focused on identifying new therapeutic targets, improving delivery systems, and using real-time feedback to refine treatment. Overall, combining immunotherapy with epigenetic modifications holds significant potential for personalized cancer treatment, paving the way for more effective and individualized therapeutic strategies that target both the immune system and the tumor microenvironment. Further development in this area is expected to revolutionize cancer therapy and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.