ReviewCureus2024
Transformative Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis With Sequential Compression Devices in the Care of Hospitalized Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Venous thrombosis unchained: Pandora's box of noninflammatory mechanisms.Blood advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a critical complication and concern in hospitalized patients due to its significant morbidity and mortality. Given the complex and multifaceted pathophysiology surrounding DVT formation, patients who have had surgical interventions faced acute or chronic trauma and prolonged immobility are at substantially high risk. Identifying these risk factors early is essential for early intervention and prophylaxis. Current standard-of-care prophylaxis for DVT includes pharmacological agents such as anticoagulants, and recently, there has been an increase in the use of mechanical medical devices such as sequential compression devices (SCDs). Pharmacological prophylaxis, while shown to be effective in some patients, carries certain risks of complications such as bleeding. SCDs offer a safer and more effective approach for these patients. SCDs function by artificially replicating the "pumping mechanism" present in the soleus muscle to enhance venous return and reduce stasis. Various types of SCDs, namely intermittent pneumatic compression and graduated compression stockings, have demonstrated clinical efficacy when used as an adjunctive intervention with anticoagulant medications. This narrative review explores the pathophysiology, risk factors, and prophylactic measures for DVT, focusing on the use of SCDs as a non-pharmacological intervention. Through synthesizing evidence from various studies obtained from PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library and evaluating the benefits and limitations of SCD use, this review highlights the need for tailored prophylactic strategies, considering patient-specific risk factors and preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.