ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Diagnostic Value of Magnetocardiography to Detect Abnormal Myocardial Perfusion: A Pilot Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Magnetocardiography Model Aids in Diagnosing Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome in Acute Chest Pain.Balkan medical journal · 2026Article
- Progress in Clinical Magnetocardiography: The Contactless Breakthrough for Noninvasive Clinical Detection of Cardiac Ischemia Now Needs Worldwide Standardization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Chaotic Dynamics Analysis of Magnetocardiography Signals for Early Detection of Myocardial Ischemia.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Magnetocardiography for Exploratory Risk Stratification in Patients With Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- Magnetocardiography Combined With the SYNTAX Score for Exploratory Modeling of Clinician-Selected Revascularization Category in Three-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center Pilot Study.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Establishment of magnetocardiogromics platform with reference range for normal magnetocardiogram.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Non-invasive mapping of ventricular action potential waveforms reconstructed from clinical unshielded magnetocardiography. Potential diagnostic application and current limitations.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- An advanced vision of magnetocardiography as an unrivalled method for a more comprehensive non-invasive clinical electrophysiological assessment.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Advances of magnetocardiography in application of adult and fetal cardiac diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of magnetocardiography as a non-invasive tool for functional assessment of myocardial ischemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a novel non-invasive technique that detects subtle magnetic fields generated by cardiomyocyte electrical activity, offering sensitive detection of myocardial ischemia. This study aimed to assess the ability of MCG to predict impaired myocardial perfusion using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods: A total of 112 patients with chest pain underwent SPECT and MCG scans, from which 65 MCG output parameters were analyzed. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to screen for significant MCG variables, three machine learning models were established to detect impaired myocardial perfusion: random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and support vector machine (SVM). The diagnostic performance was evaluated based on the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Five variables, the ratio of magnetic field amplitude at R-peak and positive T-peak (RoART+), R and T-peak magnetic field angle (RTA), maximum magnetic field angle (MAmax), maximum change in current angle (CCAmax), and change positive pole point area between the T-wave beginning and peak (CPPPATbp), were selected from 65 automatic output parameters. RTA emerged as the most critical variable in the RF, DT, and SVM models. All three models exhibited excellent diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.796, 0.780, and 0.804, respectively. While all models showed high sensitivity (RF = 0.870, DT = 0.826, SVM = 0.913), their specificity was comparatively lower (RF = 0.500, DT = 0.300, SVM = 0.100). Conclusions: Machine learning models utilizing five key MCG variables successfully predicted impaired myocardial perfusion, as confirmed by SPECT. These findings underscore the potential of MCG as a promising future screening tool for detecting impaired myocardial perfusion. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2200066942, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=187904.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.