ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Appraisal of the causal effect of
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: History of Methods: MR analyses employed genetic associations derived from UK Biobank as proxies for momp D seropositivity in 25 509 EOC cases and 40 941 controls that participated in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Findings were replicated using a GWAS meta-analyses of global biobanks including the UK Biobank, FinnGen and BioBank Japan. Results: Genetically predicted momp D seropositivity was associated with overall and high-grade serous EOC risk in inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and MR-Egger univariable MR analysis (odds ratio (OR) 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.10, and OR 1.08; 95%CI 1.01-1.16, respectively). Replication yielded similar results for overall EOC (OR 1.11; 95%CI 1.01-1.22). Conclusion: This MR study supports a causative link between
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.