ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Body composition as a biomarker for assessing future lung cancer risk.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate if body composition is a biomarker for assessing the risk of developing lung cancer. Materials and Methods: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans from the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS) (n=3,635, 22 follow-up years) and NLST-ACRIN (n=16,435, 8 follow-up years) cohorts were used in the study. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms were developed to automatically segment and quantify subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), skeletal muscle (SM), and bone. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs). Standard time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic ability of different models over time. Results: The final composite models were formed by seven variables: age (HR=1.20), current smoking status (HR=1.59), bone volume (HR=1.79), SM density (HR=0.29), IMAT ratio (HR=0.33), IMAT density (HR=0.56), and SAT volume (HR=0.56). The models trained on the PLuSS cohort achieved a mean AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.79) over 21 follow-up years and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.74) over the first 7 follow-up years for predicting lung cancer development within the PLuSS cohort. In contrast, models trained on the PLuSS cohort alone, as well as in combination with the NLST cohorts, achieved an AUC ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 in the NLST cohort over a 7-year follow-up period. Conclusion: Body composition assessed on LDCT is a significant predictor of lung cancer risk and could improve the effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening by optimizing the screening eligibility and frequency. Summary statement: Body composition assessed on LDCT is a significant predictor of lung cancer risk and could improve the effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening by optimizing the screening eligibility and frequency. Key Points: This study unveils the significant associations between body tissues and lung cancer risk.The prediction models based on body composition alone, as well as the combination of demographics and body composition features can effectively identify patients at higher risk of developing lung cancer.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.