ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Automated Deep Learning-Based Detection of Early Atherosclerotic Plaques in Carotid Ultrasound Imaging.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Extracranial Carotid Plaque Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Gene-Smoking Interaction on Risk of Atherosclerosis: Molecular Study of Prothrombin (F2) Gene rs1799963 G/A Polymorphism in Atherosclerotic Patients.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Carotid plaque presence is associated with cardiovascular risk, even among asymptomatic individuals. While deep learning has shown promise for carotid plaque phenotyping in patients with advanced atherosclerosis, its application in population-based settings of asymptomatic individuals remains unexplored. Methods: We developed a YOLOv8-based model for plaque detection using carotid ultrasound images from 19,499 participants of the population-based UK Biobank (UKB) and fine-tuned it for external validation in the BiDirect study (N = 2,105). Cox regression was used to estimate the impact of plaque presence and count on major cardiovascular events. To explore the genetic architecture of carotid atherosclerosis, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of the UKB and CHARGE cohorts. Mendelian randomization (MR) assessed the effect of genetic predisposition to vascular risk factors on carotid atherosclerosis. Results: Our model demonstrated high performance with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeding 85%, enabling identification of carotid plaques in 45% of the UKB population (aged 47-83 years). In the external BiDirect cohort, a fine-tuned model achieved 86% accuracy, 78% sensitivity, and 90% specificity. Plaque presence and count were associated with risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) over a follow-up of up to seven years, improving risk reclassification beyond the Pooled Cohort Equations. A GWAS meta-analysis of carotid plaques uncovered two novel genomic loci, with downstream analyses implicating targets of investigational drugs in advanced clinical development. Observational and MR analyses showed associations between smoking, LDL cholesterol, hypertension, and odds of carotid atherosclerosis. Conclusions: Our model offers a scalable solution for early carotid plaque detection, potentially enabling automated screening in asymptomatic individuals and improving plaque phenotyping in population-based cohorts. This approach could advance large-scale atherosclerosis research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.