Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484645›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Enabling awareness, agency and participation: Haematology patient experiences of an (in)patient portal's information affordances.

Simone Schmidt, Adam Boulton, Benita Butler, Timothy Fazio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone SchmidtEMR Team, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7348-3675
Adam BoultonEMR Team, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Benita ButlerEMR Team, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Timothy FazioEMR Team, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines patient experiences of an inpatient portal's information affordances, including access to results, notes, vital signs, medication information and a schedule. Patient participants were recruited from an inpatient ward primarily catering to patients with haematological malignancies including leukaemia and bone marrow transplant recipients at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Although focused on the inpatient experience of a portal's information affordances accessed via a hospital-provided tablet, due to limited patient access to notes in the inpatient context, this study also explored patient experiences of their outpatient portal notes accessed via their smartphone. This study demonstrates the value of an (in)patient portal in enabling patient awareness, agency and participation in their care. It shows how an (in)patient portal not only helps patients make informed decisions in their care, but can also initiate patient conversation and collaboration with clinicians. This study points how the digital mediation of healthcare can provide greater transparency in the patient-clinician relationship and address the information asymmetry that typically characterises this relationship, particularly in the Australian context, where inpatient portals are still in their infancy.

Indexed as

digital healthinformation affordancesInpatient portalspatient–clinician relationshippatient experiencepatient portalsperson-centred carequalitative researchreflexive thematic analysissharing information

Identifiers

PMID39484645
PMCPMC11526392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.