Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485336›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2024

Cannabis Use During Early Pregnancy Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization.

Kelly C Young-Wolff, Natalie E Slama, Lyndsay A Avalos, Alisa A Padon, Lynn D Silver, Sara R Adams, Monique B Does, Deborah Ansley, Carley Castellanos, Cynthia I Campbell and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kelly C Young-WolffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Natalie E SlamaDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Lyndsay A AvalosDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Alisa A PadonPublic Health Institute, Oakland, California.
Lynn D SilverPublic Health Institute, Oakland, California.
Sara R AdamsDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Monique B DoesDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Deborah AnsleyRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Carley CastellanosRegional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Cynthia I CampbellDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Stacey E AlexeeffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.

Funding

Maternal Marijuana Use During Pregnancy, Marijuana Legalization, and Adverse Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes: A 12-year Cohort StudyR01DA047405 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AVALOS, LYNDSAY AMMON, YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Impact of in utero Marijuana Exposure on Neurodevelopment, Behavior and Mental Health: A Longitudinal Birth Cohort StudyR01DA048033 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AVALOS, LYNDSAY AMMON, YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2020 to 2025
$3.1M
Identifying Risk Factors for Prenatal Substance and Polysubstance UseK01DA043604 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI YOUNG-WOLFF, KELLY CORINNE · 2017 to 2021
$907k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA043604NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047405NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It is unknown whether state recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) is related to increased rates of prenatal cannabis use or whether RCL-related changes vary with cannabis screening methods or the local policy environment. Objective: To test whether RCL in California was associated with changes in prenatal cannabis use rates, whether changes were evident in both self-report and urine toxicology testing, and whether rates varied by local policies banning vs allowing adult-use retailers post-RCL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based time-series study used data from pregnancies in Kaiser Permanente Northern California universally screened for cannabis use during early pregnancy by self-report and toxicology testing from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019. Analyses were conducted from September 2022 to August 2024. Exposures: California state RCL passage (November 9, 2016) and implementation of legal sales (January 1, 2018) were examined with a 1-month lag. Local policies allowing vs banning medical retailers pre-RCL and adult-use retailers post-RCL were also examined. Main Outcomes and Measures: Any prenatal cannabis use was based on screening at entrance to prenatal care (typically at 8-10 weeks' gestation) and defined as (1) a positive urine toxicology test result or self-report, (2) a positive urine toxicology test result, or (3) self-report. Interrupted time series models were fit using Poisson regression, adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, and neighborhood deprivation index. Results: The sample of 300 993 pregnancies (236 327 unique individuals) comprised 25.9% Asian individuals, 6.4% Black individuals, 26.0% Hispanic individuals, 37.7% White individuals, and 4.1% individuals of other, multiple, or unknown race, with a mean (SD) age of 30.3 (5.4) years. Before RCL implementation, rates of prenatal cannabis use rose steadily from 4.5% in January 2012 to 7.1% in January 2018. There was no change in use rates at the time of RCL passage (level change rate ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.11) and a statistically significant increase in rates in the first month after RCL implementation, increasing to 8.6% in February 2018 (level change RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16). Results were similar when defining prenatal cannabis use by (1) a toxicology test or (2) self-report. In local policy analyses, the post-RCL implementation increase in use was only found among those in jurisdictions allowing adult-use cannabis retailers (allowed RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.33; banned RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10). Conclusions and Relevance: In this time-series study, RCL implementation in California was associated with an increase in rates of cannabis use during early pregnancy, defined by both self-report and toxicology testing, driven by individuals living in jurisdictions that allowed adult-use retailers.

Indexed as

Legislation, DrugAdultCaliforniaCannabisFemaleHumansMarijuana UsePregnancySelf ReportYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39485336
PMCPMC11530934

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.