Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485653›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Low Energy Availability and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Tara L Gallant, Lauren F Ong, Laura Wong, Michael Sparks, Ethan Wilson, Jose L Puglisi, Valerie A Gerriets

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tara L GallantDepartment of Basic Science, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
Lauren F OngDepartment of Basic Science, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
Laura WongCalifornia State University Chico, Chico, CA, USA.
Michael SparksDepartment of Basic Science, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
Ethan WilsonDepartment of Basic Science, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
Jose L PuglisiDepartment of Basic Science, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
Valerie A GerrietsDepartment of Basic Science, California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA. valerie.gerriets@cnsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1553-2590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLow energy availability (LEA) occurs when energy expenditure from athletic training and bodily functions exceeds caloric intake. This imbalance results in declines in athletic performance and increases the risk of injury. Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a condition that occurs when the energy deficit is severe enough to cause alterations to metabolic rate, menstrual function, immune function, bone health, protein synthesis, and cardiovascular function. Many athletes, particularly those competing in endurance, aesthetic, or weight-class sports, are adversely impacted by this condition.

objectivesThis study aims to determine the prevalence of LEA and REDs among athletes and present the first secondary analysis of the impacts of these phenomena on sports performance and risk of injury.

methodsThis systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023469253). Literature searches were performed following PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane online databases. Inclusion criteria were articles discussing the prevalence of LEA or REDs, the impact of LEA or REDs on athletic performance, or the impact of LEA or REDs EA on injury.

resultsA total of 59 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, and 2737 of 6118 athletes (44.7%) in 46 different studies were determined to have LEA, including 44.2% of female athletes and 49.4% of male athletes. In addition, 460 of 730 athletes (63.0%) in eight different studies were determined to be at risk of REDs. Athletes with LEA were found to have decreased run performance, training response, endurance performance, coordination, concentration, judgment, explosive power, and agility relative to athletes with normal energy availability, as well as an increased likelihood of absence from training due to illness. Studies had mixed results as to whether LEA increased the risk of injury in general. However, most studies concluded that athletes with LEA have impaired bone health and a higher risk of bone stress injuries. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review analyzing the impacts of LEA and REDs on athletic performance and risk of injury. Due to the high estimated prevalence of LEA among athletes, coaches may want to consider employing surveys such as the low energy availability in females questionnaire (LEAF-Q) to identify athletes at risk for LEA, as early identification and correction of LEA can prevent the development of symptoms of REDs, reduce the risk of impaired bone health and bone stress injuries, and help athletes optimize the performance benefits from their training.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismRelative Energy Deficiency in SportAthletic InjuriesHumansPrevalence

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.