SynthesisPloS one2024
Effectiveness of bundled care in the management of cerebral hemorrhage complicated by pulmonary infection in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAimed to systematically evaluate the therapeutic and rehabilitative effects of bundled care on patients with cerebral hemorrhage complicated by pulmonary infection in China.
methodsRelevant literature was retrieved from multiple databases and original studies investigated the efficacy of bundled care in managing cerebral hemorrhage complicated by pulmonary infection were included. Data analysis was conducted using Meta-analysis software (RevMan 5.3 and Stata 17.0). The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the robustness of the results. Funnel plot, Begg and Egger test were conducted to assess the presence of publication bias. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023475738).
resultsTwelve studies involving 1049 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that bundled care significantly reduced the duration of antibiotic use and pulmonary infection (SMD = -0.77), reduced the duration of tracheal intubation (MD = -5.35), and shortened hospital stay (MD = -6.30). The effective rate of treatment (OR = 8.39), satisfaction degree (OR = 5.65), anxiety (MD = -4.52) and depression scores (MD = -4.38), and quality of life scores (MD = 11.75) were improved after bundled care intervention compared to routine care. Assessment of publication bias showed no significant evidence of publication bias.
conclusionsBundled care can significantly shorten the duration of illness treatment and hospital stay of patients with cerebral hemorrhage complicated by pulmonary infection, improve treatment effectiveness and satisfaction degree, alleviate anxiety and depression, and promote the improvement of quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.