Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485810›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Insect diversity estimation in polarimetric lidar.

Dolores Bernenko, Meng Li, Hampus Månefjord, Samuel Jansson, Anna Runemark, Carsten Kirkeby, Mikkel Brydegaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dolores BernenkoDept. Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6618-8232
Meng LiDept. Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4931-5647
Hampus MånefjordDept. Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1767-6010
Samuel JanssonDept. Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna RunemarkDept. Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Carsten KirkebyDept. of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel BrydegaardDept. Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0586-664X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying flying insects is a significant challenge for biologists. Entomological lidar offers a unique solution, enabling rapid identification and classification in field settings. No other method can match its speed and efficiency in identifying insects in flight. This non-intrusive tool is invaluable for assessing insect biodiversity, informing conservation planning, and evaluating efforts to address declining insect populations. Although the species richness of co-existing insects can reach tens of thousands, current photonic sensors and lidars can differentiate roughly one hundred signal types. While the retrieved number of clusters correlate with Malaise trap diversity estimates, this taxonomic specificity, the number of discernible signal types is currently limited by instrumentation and algorithm sophistication. In this study, we report 32,533 observations of wild flying insects along a 500-meter transect. We report the benefits of lidar polarization bands for differentiating species and compare the performance of two unsupervised clustering algorithms, namely Hierarchical Cluster Analysis and Gaussian Mixture Model. Our analysis shows that polarimetric properties could be partially predicted even with unpolarized light, thus polarimetric lidar bands provide only a minor improvement in specificity. Finally, we use the physical properties of the clustered observations, such as wing beat frequency, daily activity patterns, and spatial distribution, to establish a lower bound for the number of species represented by the differentiated signal types.

Indexed as

BiodiversityInsectaAlgorithmsAnimalsCluster AnalysisFlight, AnimalWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID39485810
PMCPMC11530007

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.