SynthesisBMJ open2024
Patients' experiences with the application of medical adhesives to the skin: a qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMedical adhesives provide securement of medical devices, facilitate skin protection and allow non-invasive monitoring. Application and removal of medical adhesives can result in pain, dermatitis, trauma or other skin lesions. Understanding patients' experiences when subjected to medical adhesives will contribute to the improvement of clinical routines and the development and improvement of new adhesive technologies. A qualitative systematic review was conducted to identify patients' experiences with the application of medical adhesives to the skin.
designQualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO were systematically searched for records published between January 2012 and March 2024. Reference lists of systematic reviews and included articles were reviewed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies published in Danish, Dutch, English, German, Norwegian and Swedish that collected qualitative data on the experience of patients with the application of medical adhesives to the skin were considered. There were no restrictions regarding age, gender or setting. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal were independently conducted by two reviewers. The methodological quality of the studies under consideration was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Qualitative Research. The extracted data were synthesised using meta-aggregation.
resultsNine studies describing patients' experiences were included. The included studies only reflected experiences with wound dressings. Meta-aggregation of the extracted findings resulted in seven categories that were further synthesised into two synthesised findings: 'strategies to alleviate pain during dressing changes' and 'dressing construction and characteristics'. The synthesised findings illustrate that patients experience pain during dressing change and removal and employ various strategies to alleviate this pain.
conclusionsPatients experience pain and discomfort when dressings are changed or removed. Future research should focus on enhancing both routines and technologies, with a particular emphasis on advancing skin-friendly adhesives to reduce unwanted side effects. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023457711.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.