ArticleScientific reports2024
Good vision without peripheries: behavioral and fMRI evidence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical response to transient and long-term visual field loss.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- A Task-Based Functional MRI Double Dissociation of Visual Language and Feature Processing in Healthy Adults.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In healthy vision, bright slow-motion stimuli are processed primarily by the regions of the visual system that receive input from the central part of the scene, whereas processing of dark fast-motion stimuli is more dependent on peripheral visual input. We tested 31 retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients with long-term loss of peripheral photoreceptors and healthy controls with temporarily limited peripheral vision. We measured motion-based acuity using random-dot kinematograms, establishing individual thresholds for differentiating a circle from an ellipse. Participants subsequently performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task set at a constant level of difficulty. The results showed that limiting vision did not affect motion-acuity thresholds in control participants but did cause different brain activations than those in RP patients, indicating prompt implementation of the strategy that would be perceptually successful. Compared with controls with both full and limited vision, impaired motion acuity in RP patients led to decreased brain activation, particularly in the primary peripheral visual areas V1-3. Importantly, compared with controls in full vision, matched decreased activation in MT+/V5, salience-processing cortices and the superior temporal cortex were detected in RP patients and in controls with limited peripheral vision, revealing brain networks that compensate for the loss of peripheral vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.