Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487188›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Data augmentation based on the WGAN-GP with data block to enhance the prediction of genes associated with RNA methylation pathways.

Tuo Jiang, Cong Shen, Pingjian Ding, Lingyun Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tuo JiangSchool of Computer Science, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Cong ShenDepartment of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119076, Singapore.
Pingjian DingSchool of Computer Science, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China. dpj@usc.edu.cn.
Lingyun LuoSchool of Computer Science, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China. luoly@usc.edu.cn.

Funding

Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China No.2021JJ40467National Natural Science Foundation of China No.62002154Scientific Research Startup Foundation of University of South China No.190XQD096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA methylation modification influences various processes in the human body and has gained increasing attention from scholars. Predicting genes associated with RNA methylation pathways can significantly aid biologists in studying RNA methylation processes. Several prediction methods have been investigated, but their performance is still limited by the scarcity of positive samples. To address the challenge of data imbalance in RNA methylation-associated gene prediction tasks, this study employed a generative adversarial network to learn the feature distribution of the original dataset. The quality of synthetic samples was controlled using the Classifier Two-Sample Test (CTST). These synthetic samples were then added to the data blocks to mitigate class distribution imbalance. Experimental results demonstrated that integrating the synthetic samples generated by our proposed model with the original data enhances the prediction performance of various classifiers, outperforming other oversampling methods. Moreover, gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses further demonstrate the effectiveness of the predicted genes associated with RNA methylation pathways. The model generating gene samples with PyTorch is available at https://github.com/heyheyheyheyhey1/WGAN-GP_RNA_methylation.

Indexed as

RNAAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGene OntologyHumansMethylationRNA MethylationRNAGenerative adversarial netsMachine learningPathwaysRNA methylation

Identifiers

PMID39487188
PMCPMC11530642

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.