Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487198›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative time-series analyses of gut microbiome profiles in genetically and chemically induced lupus-prone mice and the impacts of fecal transplantation.

Piraya Chatthanathon, Asada Leelahavanichkul, Thanya Cheibchalard, Alisa Wilantho, Nattiya Hirankarn, Naraporn Somboonna

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MaternalComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piraya ChatthanathonDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Asada LeelahavanichkulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. aleelahavanit@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5566-6403
Thanya CheibchalardProgram in Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Alisa WilanthoNational Biobank of Thailand, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Nattiya HirankarnDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2224-6856
Naraporn SomboonnaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. Naraporn.S@chula.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-3509

Funding

Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund Chulalongkorn University CU_FRB65_hea(68)_131_23_61
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the association between gut dysbiosis (imbalance of the microbiota) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is well-known, the simultaneous exploration in gut dysbiosis in fecal and different intestinal sections before and after lupus onset (at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 months old) resulting from the loss of inhibitory Fc gamma receptor IIb (FcGIIb) and pristane induction have never been conducted. Anti-dsDNA (an important lupus autoantibody) and proteinuria developed as early as 6 months old in both models, with higher levels in FcGRIIb deficient (FcGRIIb-/-) mice. Compared to the healthy control at 2 and 4 months, the lupus mice (both FcGRRIIb-/- and pristane) and healthy mice at 6 months old demonstrated an alteration as indicated by the Shannon alpha diversity index, highlighting influences of lupus- and age-induced dysbiosis, respectively. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) revealed that the fecal microbiota of FcGRIIb-/- mice were distinct from the age-matched healthy control at all timepoints (at 6 month, p < 0.05), while pristane mice showed divergence at only some timepoints. Analyses of different intestinal sections revealed similarity among microbiota in the cecum, colon, and feces, contrasting with those in the small intestines (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum). Subtle differences were found between FcGRIIb-/- and pristane mice in feces and the intestinal sections as assessed by several analyses, for examples, the similar or dissimilar distances (NMDS), the neighbor-joining clustering, and the potential metabolisms (KEGG pathway analysis). Due to the differences between the gut microbiota (feces and intestinal sections) in the lupus mice and the healthy control, rebalancing of the microbiota using rectal administration of feces from the healthy control (fecal transplantation; FMT) to 7-month-old FcGIIb-/- mice (the established lupus; positive anti-dsDNA and proteinuria) was performed. In comparison to FcGRIIb-/- mice without FMT, FMT mice (more effect on the female than the male mice) showed the lower anti-dsDNA levels with similar fecal microbiome diversity (16s DNA gene copy number) and microbiota patterns to the healthy control. In conclusion, gut microbiota (feces and intestinal sections) of lupus mice (FcGRIIb-/- and pristane) diverged from the control as early as 4-6 months old, correlating with lupus characteristics (anti-dsDNA and proteinuria). The different gut microbiota in FcGRIIb-/- and pristane suggested a possible different gut microbiota in lupus with various molecular causes. Furthermore, FMT appeared to mitigate gut dysbiosis and reduce anti-dsDNA, supporting the benefit of the rebalancing gut microbiota in lupus, with more studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLupus Erythematosus, SystemicReceptors, IgGAnimalsFecesFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutTerpenesFcgr2b protein, mousepristaneReceptors, IgGTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID39487198
PMCPMC11530527

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.