ArticleScientific reports2024
Propensity score-adjusted analysis on early tirofiban administration to prevent thromboembolic complications during stand-alone coil embolization of ruptured aneurysms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The timing of intraprocedural antiplatelet therapy did not affect outcomes in endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Prophylactic Intra-Arterial Eptifibatide in Stent-Assisted Coiling and Flow Diverter Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban has been shown to prevent thromboembolic events during endovascular procedures, but the benefits and risks of its prophylactic early intraprocedural administration for stand-alone coil embolization of acutely ruptured aneurysms are still unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with stand-alone coil embolization. Two study cohorts were compared according to the primary prophylactic antithrombotic medication during the procedure: patients receiving only intravenous heparin (HEP) versus patients receiving tirofiban in addition to heparin prior to final aneurysm obliteration (HEP + TF). Outcome endpoints were the incidence of angiographically visible thrombus formation or distal embolization, and the incidence of periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Of 204 cases, 159 were prophylactically treated with HEP and 45 with HEP + TF. Intraprocedural thromboembolic events were less frequent with HEP + TF before and after propensity score matching (PSM) (2.5% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.017). The incidence of ICH and symptomatic ICH did not differ between HEP + TF and HEP before and after PSM (20.5% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.29; and 5.1% vs. 4%, p = 0.88). Early intraprocedural tirofiban administration may be effective in preventing thromboembolic complications during stand-alone coil embolization of acutely ruptured aneurysms without increasing the risk of ICH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.