ReviewNature protocols2025
Design, performance, processing, and validation of a pooled CRISPR perturbation screen for bacterial toxins.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of Genome-wide Screening of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Library in Identifying Novel Molecular Targets for Xenobiotics.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unbiased forward genetic screens have been extensively employed in biological research to elucidate functional genomics. In pooled clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) perturbation screens, various genetically encoded gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations are introduced into a heterogeneous population of cells. Subsequently, these cells are screened for phenotypes, perturbation-associated genotypes are analyzed and a connection between genotype and phenotype is determined. CRISPR screening techniques enable the investigation of important biological questions, such as how bacterial toxins kill cells and cause disease. However, the broad spectrum of effects caused by diverse toxins presents a challenge when selecting appropriate screening strategies. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol for a genome-wide pooled CRISPR perturbation screen to study bacterial toxins. We describe technical considerations, pilot experiments, library construction, screen execution, result analysis and validation of the top enriched hits. These screens are applicable for many different types of toxins and are anticipated to reveal a repertoire of host factors crucial in the intoxication pathway, such as receptors, trafficking/translocation factors and substrates. The entire protocol takes 21-27 weeks and does not require specialized knowledge beyond basic biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39487259What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.