Trial reportBMC pediatrics2024
Oral sildenafil versus bosentan for treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of Sildenafil in Premature Infants with Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (SILDI-SAFE): A Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- The interplay of bosentan and finerenone in amelioration of cardiac dysfunction within benign prostatic hyperplasia in rats.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of bosentan-related therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Critical Care Dilemma: Complex Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation With Pulmonary Hypertension in a Neonate.Cureus · 2025Article
- Trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from Global Burden of Disease 1990-2021.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Use of Oral Sildenafil in the Management of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is limited in low resource settings due to non-availability and high cost. There is a need for research on low-cost alternative therapies for management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). We aimed to compare oral sildenafil and bosentan as monotherapy in the treatment of neonates with PPHN. STUDY
designIn this single-centre open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT), term and late preterm neonates with PPHN, defined as pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) > 35 mmHg and requiring fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO
resultsThirty-six neonates were analyzed (18 in each group). Initial PASPs were similar in both groups. The median (IQR) time for the primary outcome (PASP to reduce by 25% within 48 h) was 36 (24-48) h and 96 (48-120) h in sildenafil and bosentan groups respectively (p = 0.008). There was also a higher need to add other pulmonary vasodilators in bosentan group as compared to sildenafil group (p = 0.006).
conclusionSildenafil was associated with quicker reduction of PASP and FiO CLINICAL
trial registrationhttps://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/rmaindet.php? trialid=63997&EncHid=39716.16132&modid=1&compid=19[CTRI/2022/06/043328].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.