Evidence mapPaperPMID 39487428Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2024

Prediabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the effectiveness of a guided self-determination counselling approach in primary health care, a randomized controlled trial.

Elín Arnardóttir, Árún K Sigurdardóttir, Timothy Skinner, Marit Graue, Beate-Cristin Hope Kolltveit

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04688359 (Nurse-coordinated Follow-up Program in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04688359 nacompletednot on this map

Nurse-coordinated Follow-up Program in Primary Care: a Mixed-method Complex Intervention Feasibility and RCT Pilot Trial Among People at Risk for T2DM.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AkureyriRan2021 to 2023Enrolled81ConditionsPre-diabetes, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), Primary Health CareArmsGuided Self Determination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elín ArnardóttirSchool of Health, Business and Natural Sciences-Faculty of Nursing, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, 600, Iceland. elin@unak.is.ORCID 0009-0006-4976-0766
Árún K SigurdardóttirSchool of Health, Business and Natural Sciences-Faculty of Nursing, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, 600, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-4287-5409
Timothy SkinnerInstitute of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, 1017, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-6963
Marit GraueDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, 5063, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3149-6227
Beate-Cristin Hope KolltveitDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, 5063, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2704-6493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentify individuals who are at risk of Type 2 diabetes, who also are at a greater risk of developing cardiovascular disease is important. The rapid worldwide increase in diabetes prevalence call for Primary Health Care to find feasible prevention strategies, to reduce patient risk factors and promote lifestyle changes. Aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate how a nurse-lead Guided Self-Determination counselling approach can assist people at risk of type 2 diabetes to lower their coronary heart disease risk.

methodsIn this randomized controlled study, 81 people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes were assigned into an intervention group (n = 39) receiving Guided Self-Determination counselling from Primary Health Care nurses over three months and a control group (n = 42) that received a diet leaflet only. Measurements included the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score questionnaire and biological measurements of Hemoglobin A1c protein, Body Mass Index, fasting blood glucose, Blood pressure, Cholesterol, High-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides, at baseline (time1), 6 (time2) and 9 months (time 3).

resultsA total of 56 participants, equal number in intervention and control groups, completed all measurements. A significant difference between the intervention and control groups, in coronary heart disease risk was not found at 6 nor 9-months. However, within-group data demonstrated that 55.4% of the participants had lower coronary heart disease risk in the next ten years at the 9-month measurement. Indicating an overall 18% relative risk reduction of coronary heart disease risk by participating in the trial, with the number needed to treat for one to lower their risk to be nine. Within the intervention group a significant difference was found between time 1 and 3 in lower body mass index (p = 0.046), hemoglobin A1c level (p = 0.018) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.03).

conclusionsAlthough unable to show significant group differences in change of coronary heart disease risk by this 12-weeks intervention, the process of regular measurements and the guided self-determination counselling seem to be beneficial for within-group measures and the overall reduction of coronary heart disease risk factors.

trial registrationThis study is a part of the registered study 'Effectiveness of Nurse-coordinated Follow-Up Programme in Primary Care for People at Risk of T2DM' at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04688359) (accessed on 30 December 2020).

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Primary Health CareAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCounselingFemaleFinlandHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediabetic StateRisk FactorsCardiovascular heart diseasesGuided self-determinationHealth promotionPrediabetesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39487428
PMCPMC11529228

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.