Evidence mapPaperPMID 39487521Full record

ReviewDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2024

Low carbohydrate diets, glycaemic control, enablers, and barriers in the management of type 1 diabetes: a mixed methods systematic review.

Janine Paul, Rati Jani, Sarah Thorning, Mila Obucina, Peter Davoren, Catherine Knight-Agarwal

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janine PaulSchool of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia. janine.paul@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-6192
Rati JaniSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0915-4420
Sarah ThorningEducation and Research Unit, Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Rockhampton, QLD, 4700, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3476-9796
Mila ObucinaSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-1310
Peter DavorenDiabetes and Endocrinology, Adult Outpatient Department, Gold Coast University Hospital and Health Service, 1 Hospital Boulevard, D Block, Area 4, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3273-3842
Catherine Knight-AgarwalSchool of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0121-4900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical nutrition therapy is fundamental for diabetes management, however there is a lack of evidence supporting an ideal recommended carbohydrate intake for maintaining optimal glycaemia in individuals living with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Adults with T1D are increasingly drawn to very low carbohydrate (≤ 50 g/day or < 10% total energy intake) and low carbohydrate diets (< 130 g/day or < 26% total energy intake) because of the reported positive impact on both physical health and psychological well-being. Current evidence regarding the effectiveness on glycaemia and the lived experience by adults with T1D when using these diets is limited. This mixed methods systematic review was undertaken to examine the effectiveness of very low and low carbohydrate diets on HbA1c and explore the lived experience of adults with T1D who have followed these dietary regimens.

methodsSeven databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Informit Health Collection, Web of Science, and PsycInfo) were searched from inception to 1 October 2023. Quality assessment of the included studies was undertaken using the JBI's critical appraisal checklists. Separate quantitative and qualitative synthesis was performed, and findings were integrated for the purpose of comparison and complementarity.

resultsSeventeen studies of varying methodologies were included. Findings from quantitative research were inconclusive in determining the effectiveness of very low and low carbohydrate diets on HbA1c levels. Qualitative data synthesis identified four themes [1) Motivation to follow the diet, 2) Health benefits of the diet, 3) Challenges of the diet, and 4) Limited information (participants knowledge, information sources) about the diet] that influenced adherence to very low and low carbohydrate diets. Through the integration of results from selected studies, it was evident that there were conflicting outcomes between quantitative and qualitative studies.

conclusionsThere is little evidence to indicate that very low and low carbohydrate diets improve HbA1c in adults with T1D. However, this goes against the reported lived experiences of participants. This review highlights the insufficiency of robust evidence on this topic. Future research involving larger participant samples over longer durations are needed to provide more definitive evidence in relation to the efficacy of these diets and into the enablers and barriers experienced when using a very low or low carbohydrate diet in order to provide support to adults with T1D. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42023482800.

Indexed as

AdultsDiabetes type 1Mixed methods systematic reviewQualitativeVery low carbohydrate diet; low carbohydrate diet; quantitative

Identifiers

PMID39487521
PMCPMC11531154

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.