Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487742›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical investigation2025

Adiponectin as a biomarker in liver cirrhosis-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Vera Ciornolutchii, Thelva Esposito Herrera, Mohamed Ismaiel, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuta, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Dan L Dumitrascu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulrahman Ismaiel2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-271X
Vera Ciornolutchii2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Thelva Esposito HerreraFaculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mohamed IsmaielDepartment of General Surgery, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, UK.
Daniel-Corneliu LeucutaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-8622
Stefan-Lucian Popa2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5508-2598
Dan L Dumitrascu2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-7662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdiponectin, a key adipokine, shows promise as a non-invasive biomarker for liver cirrhosis by reflecting inflammation and metabolic changes, but conflicting findings highlight the need for a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify its role. Our study aimed to evaluate adiponectin levels across various stages of liver cirrhosis, compare them with other chronic liver diseases (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and assess its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker.

methodsOur systematic search was conducted on September 2023 using PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus, searching for observational studies evaluating serum and plasma adiponectin levels in liver cirrhosis. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. To evaluate the overall effect size, we utilized a random-effects model along with a mean difference (MD) analysis. The principal summary outcome was the MD in adiponectin levels.

resultsWe included 16 articles involving 2617 subjects in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. We found significantly higher adiponectin levels in liver cirrhosis patients (8.181 [95% CI 3.676, 12.686]), especially in Child-Pugh B individuals (13.294 [95% CI 4.955, 21.634]), compared to controls. Child-Pugh A patients did not show significant differences compared to controls. In addition, adiponectin levels were significantly elevated in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients compared to controls (8.669 [95% CI .291, 17.047]), as well as in liver cirrhosis compared to other CLD patients (4.805 [95% CI 1.247, 8.363]), including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (8.532 [95% CI 3.422, 13.641]), but not viral hepatitis. No significant MD was observed between liver cirrhosis and HCC patients.

conclusionAdiponectin levels are significantly elevated in liver cirrhosis, especially in advanced stages, potentially serving as a biomarker for advanced cirrhosis. Adiponectin also differentiates cirrhosis from other CLD, including NAFLD. However, its role in distinguishing cirrhosis from viral hepatitis and HCC is limited.

Indexed as

AdiponectinBiomarkersCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseHumansLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryPrognosisAdiponectinADIPOQ protein, humanBiomarkersadipokinesadiponectinChild‐Pughchronic liver diseaseshepatocellular carcinomainflammationliver cirrhosis

Identifiers

PMID39487742
PMCPMC11628646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.