Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487879›Full record

ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2025

Digital PCR in Virology: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.

David Gleerup, Wim Trypsteen, Stephanie I Fraley, Ward De Spiegelaere

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David GleerupLaboratory of Veterinary Morphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Campus Merelbeke, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0409-0763
Wim TrypsteenGhent University Digital PCR Consortium, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9066-4932
Stephanie I FraleyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1548-4442
Ward De SpiegelaereLaboratory of Veterinary Morphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Campus Merelbeke, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium. Ward.DeSpiegelaere@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2097-8439

Funding

special research fund of Ghent University 01IO0420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital PCR (dPCR) has been used in the field of virology since its inception. Technological innovations in microfluidics more than a decade ago caused a sharp increase in its use. There is an emerging consensus that dPCR now outperforms quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the basic parameters such as precision, sensitivity, accuracy, repeatability and resistance to inhibitors. These strengths have led to several current applications in quantification, mutation detection and environmental DNA and RNA samples. In high throughput scenarios, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the cost and throughput still significantly hampered the adaption of dPCR. There is much unexplored potential within the multiplexing capabilities of dPCR. This will allow simultaneous multi-target quantification and can also partially alleviate the throughput and cost drawback. In this review, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of dPCR with a focus on virology applications and we discuss future applications. Finally, we discuss recent evolutions of the technology in the form of real-time dPCR and digital high-resolution melting.

Indexed as

COVID-19Polymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2VirologyHumansRNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.