Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487900›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Histopathological Prognostic Factors of Surgically Treated HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Branden Qi Yu Chua, Vanessa Wei Shan Chong, Hanis Binte Abdul Kadir, Brian Sheng Yep Yeo, Pei Yuan Fong, Isabelle Jia Hui Jang, Chwee Ming Lim

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Influence of resection status on overall survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma - a retrospective analysis of cancer registry data.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Exploration of clear surgical margin in human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Branden Qi Yu ChuaLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Vanessa Wei Shan ChongLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Hanis Binte Abdul KadirHealth Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Brian Sheng Yep YeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Pei Yuan FongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Isabelle Jia Hui JangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. isabelle.jang.j.h@singhealth.com.sg.
Chwee Ming LimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. gmslchm@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-4365

Funding

SingHealth Singapore Health Services Talent Development Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rising in prevalence and is associated with better survival than HPV-negative OPSCC. In surgically treated HPV-negative OPSCCs, adverse pathologic features such as positive surgical margins, extra-nodal extension (ENE) and perineural invasion are well described to portend worse clinical outcomes. These adverse pathological features, however, are not validated prognostic markers among surgically treated HPV-positive OPSCCs. To that end, we pooled all available evidence to address the prognostic significance of these histologic features. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases were systematically searched for articles evaluating 13 known adverse histopathological prognostic factors of surgically treated HPV-associated OPSCC. Data analysis was done using R v4.0.5.

resultsA total of 32 studies (n = 31,535) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. ENE and advanced pT stage were associated with poorer overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR):1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.59-2.03], p < 0.0001, HR: 3.28, 95% CI [2.20-4.87], p = 0.0025]; disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR: 3.14, 95% CI [1.20-8.26], p = 0.0327, HR: 3.49, 95% CI [2.45-4.96], p = 0.0043) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 2.03, 95% CI [1.05-3.94], p = 0.0397, HR: 3.66, 95% CI [2.81-4.77], p = 0.0001) respectively. The presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.46, 95% CI [1.22-1.75], p = 0.0018) and positive margins (HR: 1.50, 95% CI [1.185-1.899], p = 0.0069) significantly worsen OS.

conclusionENE, advanced pT stage, positive margins and lymphovascular invasion were adverse histologic prognostic marker among surgically treated HPV-positive OPSCC. The presence of these factors should be carefully evaluated in order to select the optimal patients for surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Oropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsCarcinoma, Squamous CellHumansMargins of ExcisionNeoplasm InvasivenessPapillomaviridaePrognosisSurvival RateExtranodal extensionHuman papillomavirusLymphovascular invasionMarginMeta-analysisOropharyngeal cancerPrognosisTNM staging

Identifiers

PMID39487900

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.