Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39487933›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025

Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.

David Lazris, Heidi S Donovan, Paul Scott, Marci L Nilsen, Teresa Hagan Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Self-advocacy training within a peer navigation model in advanced cancer: a pilot study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David LazrisDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Heidi S DonovanSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Paul ScottSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Marci L NilsenSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Teresa Hagan ThomasSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Victoria Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. t.thomas@pitt.edu.

Funding

Extension of STRONG Study to Expand Intervention ImpactR37CA262025 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Teresa Hagan Thomas · 2021 to 2026
$3.7M
Development and Validation of a Measure of Self-Advocacy in Female Cancer SurvivoF31NR014066 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI THOMAS, TERESA HAGAN · 2013 to 2015
$90k
American Cancer Society DSCN-14-077-01-SCNNCI NIH HHS R37 CA262025NINR NIH HHS F31 NR014066NINR NIH HHS F31NR014066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding gender variations in self-advocacy can help oncology clinicians support the educational needs of cancer survivors. This study aims to examine the role of gender along with additional other sociodemographic variables in how cancer survivors self-advocate including their engagement in decision-making, communication with healthcare providers, and use of social support. Data from two cross-sectional descriptive studies were combined for analyses. Each study used convenience sampling methods to recruit adults (≥ 18 years old) with a history of invasive cancer who had English literacy from cancer clinics and community advocacy groups. The first study recruited women (n = 317), and the second study recruited men (n = 179). In both studies, participants completed two assessments of self-advocacy: Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship (SACS) Scale and the Patient Self-Advocacy Scale. We built a linear regression model to test the association between gender and self-advocacy total and subscale scores controlling for covariates. N = 496 participants completed study procedures between 2014 and 2022. On both self-advocacy scales, women reported higher self-advocacy scores compared to men, with women's higher scores on the SACS subscales of connected strength and informed decision-making driving the gender difference in cancer-specific self-advocacy. Self-advocacy behaviors are associated with gender, most notably by way of individuals' ability to derive strength through social connection. Women tend to have greater engagement in care with larger and more meaningful social networks, while men report less engagement. Educational materials for cancer survivors should leverage gender-associated self-advocacy skills and bolster skills that require support.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsDecision MakingNeoplasmsPatient AdvocacySocial SupportAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsCancerCancer survivorshipGenderSelf-advocacySocial connection

Identifiers

PMID39487933
PMCPMC12105839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.