Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488549›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024

Benefit of systemic therapy in MINDACT patients with small, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.

Florentine S Hilbers, Coralie Poncet, Konstantinos Tryfonidis, Giuseppe Viale, Suzette Delaloge, Jean-Yves Pierga, Etienne G C Brain, Isabel T Rubio, Alastair M Thompson, Emiel J T Rutgers and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00433589 (MINDACT), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00433589 phase3completednot on this map

MINDACT (Microarray In Node-Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy): A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the 70-Gene Signature With the Common Clinical-Pathological Criteria in Selecting Patients for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer With 0 to 3 Positive Nodes

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCRan2007 to 2020Enrolled6,600ConditionsBreast CancerArmsanthracycline-based, docetaxel and capecitabine, tamoxifen, Letrozole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Florentine S HilbersDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-3102
Coralie PoncetEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer- EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Konstantinos TryfonidisEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer- EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe VialeDepartment of Pathology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Suzette DelalogeDepartment of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustav Roussy, Villejuif, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-9165
Jean-Yves PiergaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-9995
Etienne G C BrainDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0881-9371
Isabel T RubioBreast Surgical Oncology Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Alastair M ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Emiel J T RutgersDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martine J PiccartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Laura J van 't VeerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-8298
Fatima CardosoBreast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal. fatimacardoso@fundacaochampaliamaud.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-2249

Funding

European Commission (EC) FP6-LSHCCT- 2004-503426Susan G. Komen (Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation) SG05-0922-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-), lymph node-negative breast cancers are associated with relatively low rates of disease recurrence and have therefore been underrepresented in clinical trials assessing the effects of systemic therapy. Consequently, it remains uncertain if this patient population derives benefit from these treatments. For this exploratory analysis, we selected MINDACT (NCT00433589) patients with a HR+, HER2-, T1ab (≤1 cm) tumor and negative lymph nodes. Patients with discordant clinical risk and MammaPrint genomic risk classification were randmomized to receive chemotherapy based on either the clinical or the genomic risk assessment. Endocrine therapy treatment was based on local guidelines. 715/6693 (10.7%) MINDACT patients had HR+, HER2-, T1abN0 breast cancer and were included in this analysis. All were clinically low-risk, 124/715 (17.3%) were genomic high-risk. For genomic high-risk tumors, 8-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was 92.9% (95% CI 86.2-96.4%) compared to 95.0% (95% CI 92.8-96.6%) for genomic low-risk tumors. For genomic high-risk tumors treated with or without chemotherapy, 8-year DMFS was 89.2% (95% CI 73.6-95.8%) and 94.1% (95% CI 82.9-98.1%), respectively. For genomic low-risk tumors, the 8-year DMFS and disease-free survival (DFS) were 96.1% (95% CI 93.4-97.6%) and 89.3% (95% CI 85.5-92.2%) when treated with endocrine therapy and 92.9% (95% CI 87.9-95.9%) and 79.4% (95% CI 72.5-84.8%) without. In conclusion, although the number of randomized patients is small, patients with small, genomic high-risk breast cancer did not seem to derive benefit from chemotherapy. Endocrine therapy was associated with improved outcomes even in genomic low-risk breast cancers.

Identifiers

PMID39488549
PMCPMC11531586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.