Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39488636›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for preoperative prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect in breast cancer based on

Xuefeng Hou, Kun Chen, Xing Wan, Huiwen Luo, Xiaofeng Li, Wengui Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The predictive value ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuefeng Hou *Department of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Kun Chen *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China.
Xing WanDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Huiwen LuoDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China. xli03@tmu.edu.cn.
Wengui XuDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi Distinct, Tianjin, 300060, China. wenguixy@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the value of

methods190 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria from 2017 to 2022 were studied. Features were extracted from the PET/CT intratumoral and peritumoral regions, feature selection was performed through the correlation analysis, t-tests, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO). Four classifiers, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), and naive bayes (NB) were used to build the prediction models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to measure the predictive performance of the models. Concurrent stratified analysis was conducted to establish subtype-specific features for each molecular subtype.

resultsCompared to intratumoral features alone, intratumoral + peritumoral features achieved higher AUC values in each classifier. The SVM model constructed with intratumoral + peritumoral features achieved the highest AUC values in both the train and test set (train set: 0.95 and test set: 0.83). Subtype-specific features improve performance in predicting the efficacy of NAC (luminal group: 0.90; HER2 + group: 0.86; triple negative group: 0.92).

conclusionIntratumoral and peritumoral radiomics models based on

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Neoadjuvant TherapyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG PET/CTBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39488636
PMCPMC11531439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.