ArticleScientific reports2024
Multimodal AI/ML for discovering novel biomarkers and predicting disease using multi-omics profiles of patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Precision Cardiac Rehabilitation: Current Limitations and Future Opportunities of Omics and Artificial Intelligence.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- From Automated ECG Interpretation to Multimodal Cardiovascular Intelligence: The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics integration for plant enhancement: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence models in predicting major cardiovascular events: insights from the PolyIran and PolyPars prospective studies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Precision Cardiogenomics in Athletes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence Strategies for Mechanistic Cancer Target Discovery and Drug Development: A State-of-the-Art Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Silent Myocardial Infarction Revisited: Immuno-metabolic Mechanisms, Multimodal Biomarkers, and Translational Diagnostics.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Mapping the Ischemic Continuum: Dynamic Multi-Omic Biomarker and AI for Personalized Stroke Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Global Genomic Resources: A Narrative Review of Implications for Precision Medicine.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Multi-Algorithm R Shiny Application for Predictive Modeling and Analytics: Case Study of Alzheimer Disease Diagnostics.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Mapping the landscape of predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Genetic and Genomic Testing in Cardiovascular Disease: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Article
- Multi-omics strategies for biomarker discovery and application in personalized oncology.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Ensemble learning approaches for early prediction of chronic kidney disease based on polysomnographic phenotype analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of Genome Sequencing in Infectious Diseases: From Pathogen Identification to Precision Medicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Role of Homeobox (HOX) Genes in Adult Cardiovascular Disease: From Developmental Regulators to Therapeutic Targets.Cureus · 2025Review
- AI-driven discovery of novel extracellular matrix biomarkers in pelvic organ prolapse.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are complex, multifactorial conditions that require personalized assessment and treatment. Advancements in multi-omics technologies, namely RNA sequencing and whole-genome sequencing, have provided translational researchers with a comprehensive view of the human genome. The efficient synthesis and analysis of this data through integrated approach that characterizes genetic variants alongside expression patterns linked to emerging phenotypes, can reveal novel biomarkers and enable the segmentation of patient populations based on personalized risk factors. In this study, we present a cutting-edge methodology rooted in the integration of traditional bioinformatics, classical statistics, and multimodal machine learning techniques. Our approach has the potential to uncover the intricate mechanisms underlying CVD, enabling patient-specific risk and response profiling. We sourced transcriptomic expression data and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from both CVD patients and healthy controls. By integrating these multi-omics datasets with clinical demographic information, we generated patient-specific profiles. Utilizing a robust feature selection approach, we identified a signature of 27 transcriptomic features and SNPs that are effective predictors of CVD. Differential expression analysis, combined with minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection, highlighted biomarkers that explain the disease phenotype. This approach prioritizes both biological relevance and efficiency in machine learning. We employed Combination Annotation Dependent Depletion scores and allele frequencies to identify variants with pathogenic characteristics in CVD patients. Classification models trained on this signature demonstrated high-accuracy predictions for CVD. The best performing of these models was an XGBoost classifier optimized via Bayesian hyperparameter tuning, which was able to correctly classify all patients in our test dataset. Using SHapley Additive exPlanations, we created risk assessments for patients, offering further contextualization of these predictions in a clinical setting. Across the cohort, RPL36AP37 and HBA1 were scored as the most important biomarkers for predicting CVDs. A comprehensive literature review revealed that a substantial portion of the diagnostic biomarkers identified have previously been associated with CVD. The framework we propose in this study is unbiased and generalizable to other diseases and disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.