Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39489868›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2025

Attention and executive delays in early childhood: a meta-analysis of neurodevelopmental conditions.

Dabin Lee, Kelsie A Boulton, Carter Sun, Natalie L Phillips, Martha Munro, Fiona Kumfor, Eleni A Demetriou, Adam J Guastella

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dabin Lee *Clinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental (CAN) research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Kelsie A Boulton *Clinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental (CAN) research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Carter SunClinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental (CAN) research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0800-3906
Natalie L PhillipsClinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental (CAN) research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Martha MunroClinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental (CAN) research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-6766-5855
Fiona KumforSchool of Psychology and Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3208-075X
Eleni A DemetriouClinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental (CAN) research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-5972
Adam J GuastellaClinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental (CAN) research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia. adam.guastella@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-4625

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1158762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this review was to evaluate attention and executive function performance in children with neurodevelopmental conditions across the first 5 years of life, compared to neurotypical peers. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched until June 30, 2023, and studies comparing attention or executive function between children with (or at risk for) neurodevelopmental conditions and neurotypical (or low risk) peers, 0 to 5 years old, were included. Of the 4338 studies identified, 111 studies with 12292 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The qualitative analysis of brain development included 5 studies. Primary outcomes were the standardised mean difference (Hedges' g) in attention and executive function between groups. Meta-regressions examined moderating effects of age, biological sex, diagnosis, and measure type. Children with neurodevelopmental conditions showed small delays in attention (n = 49 studies, k = 251 outcomes, g = 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.48, p < 0.001) and moderate delays in executive function (n = 64 studies, k = 368 outcomes, g = 0.64,95% CI 0.53-0.76, p < 0.001). Attention and executive function delays could not be identified in the first year (equivalence tests, p < 0.001), small to moderate delays were found in toddlerhood and moderate delays by preschool. Delays identified were largely transdiagnostic, although there was some evidence of diagnosis-specific delays for attention and moderation by measure type (informant rating vs performance-based vs physiological). Qualitative analysis described how delays were underpinned by a divergence of brain development in medial prefrontal regions. These findings highlight the potential of using attention and executive measures to detect delay and to intervene in neurodevelopmental conditions early in life.

Indexed as

AttentionExecutive FunctionNeurodevelopmental DisordersBrainChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID39489868
PMCPMC12015172

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.