Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39491527›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

Construction of a Prognostic Model for Mitochondria and Macrophage Polarization Correlation in Glioma Based on Single-Cell and Transcriptome Sequencing.

Pengyu Chen, Heping Wang, Yufei Zhang, Siyao Qu, Yulian Zhang, Yanbo Yang, Chuanpeng Zhang, Kun He, Hanhan Dang, Yang Yang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pengyu ChenChina-Japan Friendship Hospital (Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2981-0149
Heping WangDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yufei ZhangDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Siyao QuDepartment of Medical Genetics, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yulian ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanbo YangChina-Japan Friendship Hospital (Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chuanpeng ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kun HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hanhan DangChina-Japan Friendship Hospital (Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Shaoyi LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0868-0912
Yanbing YuChina-Japan Friendship Hospital (Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Fundation L222034Grants from the National Key R D Program of China 2022YFC2402500National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022NHLHCRF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous diseases are associated with the interplay of mitochondrial and macrophage polarization. However, the correlation of mitochondria-related genes (MRGs) and macrophage polarization-related genes (MPRGs) with the prognosis of glioma remains unclear. This study aimed to examine this relationship based on bioinformatic analysis.

methodsGlioma-related datasets (TCGA-GBMLGG, mRNA-seq-325, mRNA-seq-693, GSE16011, GSE4290, and GSE138794) were included in this study. The intersection genes were obtained by overlapping differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from differential expression analysis in GSE16011, key module genes from WGCNA, and MRGs. Subsequently, the intersection genes were further screened to obtain prognostic genes. Following this, a risk model was developed and verified. After that, independent prognostic factors were identified, followed by the construction of a nomogram and subsequent evaluation of its predictive ability. Furthermore, immune microenvironment analysis and expression validation were implemented. The GSE138794 dataset was utilized to evaluate the expression of prognostic genes at a cellular level, followed by conducting an analysis on cell-to-cell communication. Finally, the results were validated in different datasets and tissue samples from patients.

resultsECI2, MCCC2, OXCT1, SUCLG2, and CPT2 were identified as prognostic genes for glioma. The risk model constructed based on these genes in TCGA-GBMLGG demonstrated certain accuracy in predicting the occurrence of glioma. Additionally, the nomogram constructed based on risk score and grade exhibited strong performance in predicting patient survival. Significant differences were observed in the proportion of 27 immune cell types (e.g., activated B cells and macrophages) and the expression of 32 immune checkpoints (e.g., CD70, CD200, and CD48) between the two risk groups. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed that CPT2, ECI2, and SUCLG2 were highly expressed in oligodendrocytes, neural progenitor cells, and BMDMs, respectively. The results of cell-cell communication analysis revealed that both oligodendrocytes and BMDMs exhibited a substantial number of interactions with high strength.

conclusionThis study revealed five genes associated with the prognosis of glioma (ECI2, MCCC2, OXCT1, SUCLG2, and CPT2), providing novel insights into individualized treatment and prognosis.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMacrophagesMitochondriaTranscriptomeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisSingle-Cell AnalysisTumor Microenvironmentgliomaimmune microenvironmentmacrophage polarizationmitochondriarisk modelsingle‐cell RNA‐seq analysis

Identifiers

PMID39491527
PMCPMC11532235

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.