Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39492894›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Machine learning model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound assisting LI-RADS diagnosis of HCC: A multicenter diagnostic study.

Meiqin Xiao, Yishu Deng, Wei Zheng, Lishu Huang, Wei Wang, Hao Yang, Danyan Gao, Zhixing Guo, Jianwei Wang, Chaofeng Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Meiqin XiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yishu DengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Wei ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Lishu HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Danyan GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhixing GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jianwei WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Chaofeng LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Fang LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Feng HanDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To enhance the accuracy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis using contrast-enhanced (CE) US, the American College of Radiology developed the CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). However, the system still exhibits limitations in distinguishing between HCC and non-HCC lesions. Purpose: To investigate the viability of employing machine learning methods based on quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for distinguishing HCC within LR-M nodules. Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted on pre-treatment CEUS data from liver nodule patients across multiple centers between January 2013 and June 2022. Quantitative analysis was performed using CEUS images, and the machine learning diagnostic models based on quantitative parameters were utilized for the classification diagnosis of LR-M nodules. The performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with the performance of four radiologists. Results: The training and internal testing datasets comprised 168 patients (median age, 53 years [IQR, 18 years]), while the external testing datasets from two other centers included 110 patients (median age, 54 years [IQR, 16 years]). In the internal independent test set, the top-performing Random Forest model achieved an AUC of 0.796 (95%CI: 0.729-0.853) for diagnosing HCC. This model exhibited a sensitivity of 0.752 (95%CI: 0.750-0.755) and a specificity of 0.761 (95%CI: 0.758-0.764), outperforming junior radiologists who achieved an AUC of 0.619 (95%CI: 0.543-0.691, Conclusion: Significant differences in contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters are observed between HCC and non-HCC lesions. Machine learning models leveraging these parameters effectively distinguish HCC categorized as LR-M, offering a valuable adjunct for the accurate classification of liver nodules within the CEUS LI-RADS framework.

Indexed as

Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasoundHepatocellular carcinomaImage enhancementLiver imaging reporting and data systemMachine learningQuantitative ultrasoundTime-intensity curveUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39492894
PMCPMC11531631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.