ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2024
Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the management of heart failure: Veni, Vidi, and Vici.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers (including angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors), beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor blockers remain the mainstay of pharmacotherapy for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, despite the use of guideline-directed medical therapy, the mortality from HFrEF remains high. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comprises approximately half of the total incident HF cases; however, unlike HFrEF, there are no proven therapies for this condition. Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) represent a new class of pharmacological agents approved for diabetes mellitus (DM) that inhibit SGLT-2 receptors in the kidney. A serendipitous finding from seminal trials of SGLT-2is in DM was the significant improvement in renal and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. More importantly, the improvement in HF hospitalization (HHF) in the CV outcomes trials of SGLT-2is was striking. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed for the pleiotropic effects of SGLT-2is beyond their glycemic control. However, as patients with HF were not included in any of these trials, it can be considered as a primary intervention. Subsequently, two landmark studies of SGLT-2is in patients with HFrEF, namely, an empagliflozin outcome trial in patients with chronic HF and a reduced ejection fraction (EMPEROR-Reduced) and dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse outcomes in HF (DAPA-HF), demonstrated significant improvement in HHF and CV mortality regardless of the presence of DM. These impressive results pitchforked these drugs as class I indications in patients with HFrEF across major guidelines. Thereafter, empagliflozin outcome trial in patients with chronic HF with preserved ejection fraction (EMPEROR-Preserved) and dapagliflozin evaluation to improve the lives of patients with preserved ejection fraction HF (DELIVER) trials successively confirmed that SGLT-2is also benefit patients with HFpEF with or without DM. These results represent a watershed as they constitute the first clinically meaningful therapy for HFpEF in the past three decades of evolution of HF management. Emerging positive data for the use of SGLT-2is in acute HF and post-myocardial infarction scenarios have strengthened the pivotal role of these agents in the realm of HF. In a short span of time, these classes of drugs have captivated the entire scenario of HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.