ArticleCureus2024
Chiropractor Perceptions of Non-registered Practitioners Utilizing Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore registered chiropractors' perceptions of the use of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) by non-registered practitioners in Hong Kong, assessing the associated risks, adverse events, and patient management approaches. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted among registered chiropractors in Hong Kong using an online questionnaire. The survey, distributed via chiropractic associations from January 26 to March 20, 2024, gathered data on the practitioners' experiences with patients previously treated by non-registered practitioners, including the types of adverse events observed and subsequent interventions required. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. A total of 134 valid responses were received. Results Among respondents, a significant proportion (91%) of chiropractors reported observing adverse effects in patients treated by non-registered practitioners, with the most common issues being the aggravation of existing symptoms (95.5%) and new or unexpected complaints (82.8%). The most frequently required interventions included imaging (97%), medication (58.2%), and specialist referrals (59%). Respondents indicated that these adverse events could often have been prevented if proper training and certification were in place. Common reasons cited by patients for seeking care from non-registered practitioners included a lack of awareness about licensed care (90.3%) and cost considerations (80.6%). Conclusion The study highlights concerns reported by registered chiropractors regarding the safety of SMT performed by non-registered practitioners in Hong Kong. These concerns emphasize the need for enhanced public education on potential risks and stricter regulatory oversight. Although direct data on the occurrence of adverse events was not collected, the findings suggest that many risks could potentially be mitigated with proper training, underscoring the importance of credentialed care in ensuring patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.