ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024
Big data and artificial intelligence applied to blood and CSF fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Rethinking MS Therapeutics: From Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms to AI-Driven Drug Discovery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026Review
- Integrating Blood-Based Immune-Inflammation Biomarkers into Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prognostic Models in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From lesion detection to outcome prediction: artificial intelligence and deep learning applications in multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Multi-omics-driven biomarker discovery in autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has meant a turning point in data analysis, allowing predictions of unseen outcomes with precedented levels of accuracy. In multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory-demyelinating condition of the central nervous system with a complex pathogenesis and potentially devastating consequences, AI-based models have shown promising preliminary results, especially when using neuroimaging data as model input or predictor variables. The application of AI-based methodologies to serum/blood and CSF biomarkers has been less explored, according to the literature, despite its great potential. In this review, we aimed to investigate and summarise the recent advances in AI methods applied to body fluid biomarkers in MS, highlighting the key features of the most representative studies, while illustrating their limitations and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.