ArticleClinical case reports2024
46-kg abdominal tumor misdiagnosed as obesity: Unveiling healthcare bias due to obesity stigma.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Key Clinical Message: Obesity results in higher risk of some cancers while obesity stigma affect patient's quality of care. In this case report, a 46 kg ovary mass was misdiagnosed as severe obesity. Obesity stigma awareness and a sustained effort from healthcare professionals are required to deliver adequate patient care to patients with obesity. Abstract: Obesity is a disease associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders, and some cancers. Obesity stigma affect patients and healthcare professionals leading to mistrust, poor adherence, noncompliance to screening, and misdiagnosis. We reported a case report of a patient sent to our referral center for surgical evaluation of long-standing severe obesity (BMI 59). Physical examination was significant for abdominal obesity with a hard consistency, but no cushingoid dysmorphism or lipodystrophy. No abdominal pain, pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, or change in bowel movements were present. Tumor markers were normal except for an elevated Ca 19.9. Imaging showed a large, intraperitoneal abdominal mass with no metastatic disease. The patient underwent surgery to remove a 46-kg complex ovarian cystic mass (circumference: 160 cm, diameter: 67 cm), full of liquid and with six nodular areas. The mass was entirely extracted with an intact capsule. The cystic mass resulted in a well-differentiated intestinal-type adenocarcinoma with microinvasive foci, an endophytic borderline area (sec. WHO 2014), and mucinous-cystic areas with no atypia. The patient had postoperative bilateral basal pleural effusion resolved with conservative treatment and was discharged at home on postoperative day 12 with an uneventful 90-day postoperative follow-up. In the present case report, a 46 kg ovary mass was misdiagnosed as severe obesity, and the patient was referred for bariatric evaluation. Unveiling biases related to obesity stigma is the first step to ensuring better patient care. Obesity stigma awareness and a sustained effort from healthcare professionals are required to deliver adequate patient care to patients with obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.