Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39495357›Full record

Trial reportCognitive processing2025

The effects of cognitive training on driving performance.

Jose L Tapia, David Sánchez-Borda, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cognitive processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jose L TapiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain. jtapia@nebrija.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9984-2974
David Sánchez-BordaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.
Jon Andoni DuñabeitiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2021-126884NB-I00Ministerio de Universidades FPU19/02239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driving is a complex task necessitating an intricate interplay of sensory, motor, and cognitive abilities. Extensive research has underscored the role of neurocognitive functions, including attention, memory, executive functions, and visuospatial skills, in driving safety and performance. Despite evidence suggesting cognitive training's potential in enhancing driving abilities, comprehensive cognitive training's impact on driving performance in young adult drivers remains unexplored. Our study aimed to fill this gap by implementing an intensive, 8-week, multidomain computerized cognitive training program and assessing its transfer effects on the driving performance of young adult drivers, using a high-fidelity simulator. The study employed a randomized controlled trial design, with passive control group. The mixed-design analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a notable interaction between the time of testing and the respective participant groups concerning driving performance. Post hoc analyses showed that, compared to the control group, participants undergoing cognitive training demonstrated significantly fewer traffic infractions in the post-training evaluation. These findings suggest that cognitive training could be a useful tool for enhancing driving safety and performance in young adult drivers. Further research should aim to address the limitations posed by the absence of an active control group.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCognitionPsychomotor PerformanceAdolescentAdultAttentionCognitive TrainingFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCogniFitCognitive trainingDriving performanceDriving safetyNeurocognitive functionsYoung drivers

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.