ArticlePLoS pathogens2024
Tissue specific innate immune responses impact viral infection in Drosophila.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome composition modulates the lethal outcome of Drosophila A virus infection.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- Inter-organ communication in Drosophila: Lipoproteins, adipokines, and immune-metabolic coordination.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025Review
- Nora virus proliferates in dividing intestinal stem cells and sensitizes flies to intestinal infection and oxidative stress.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DsRNA as pathogen-associated molecular pattern in innate immunity and multiple functions of the RNAi machinery complicate the use of RNAi in pest control.Frontiers in insect science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
All organisms sense and respond to pathogenic challenge. Tissue-specific responses are required to combat pathogens infecting distinct cell types. Cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) are produced endogenously downstream of pathogen recognition or by pathogens themselves which bind to STING to activate NF-kB-dependent antimicrobial gene expression programs. It remains unknown whether there are distinct immune responses to CDNs in Drosophila tissues. Here, we investigated tissue specific CDN-STING responses and uncovered differences in gene-induction patterns across tissues that play important roles in viral infections. Using tissue-and cell-specific genetic studies we found that dSTING in the fat body controls CDN-induced expression of dSTING-regulated gene 1 (Srg1) but not dSTING-regulated gene 2 (Srg2) or 3 (Srg3). In contrast, the gastrointestinal tract largely controls expression of Srg2 and Srg3. We found that Srg3 is antiviral against the natural fly pathogen Drosophila C virus and the human arthropod-borne Rift Valley Fever virus (RVFV), but not other arthropod-borne viruses including Sindbis virus and dengue virus. Furthermore, we found that Srg3 has an important role in controlling RVFV infection of the ovary which has important implications in understanding vertical transmission of viruses and RVFV in mosquitoes. Overall, our study underscores the importance of tissue-specific responses in antiviral immunity and highlights the complex tissue regulation of the CDN-STING pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.