ArticleScientific reports2024
Circadian rhythm and daytime variation do not affect intraoperative bacterial sternal contamination and postoperative wound infections following cardiac surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have documented various effects of circadian rhythm and daytime variations on the cardiovascular and immune system as well as wound healing. From June to December 2016, n = 367 cardiac surgery patients were enrolled. Microbiological swabs from the mediastinum and subcutaneous wound were taken before sternal closure. Patients were assigned to groups based on operation start: morning (n = 219) or afternoon (n = 135). Bacterial contamination and wound infections were studied in relation to circadian rhythm and daytime variation. We did not observe any difference in mortality (morning: 3.7%, afternoon: 3.0%, p > 0.99) and major adverse events (morning: 8.2%, afternoon: 5.9%, p = 0.53). In 27.7% of the morning group, at least one positive intraoperative swab was observed, similar to the afternoon group (25.6%, p = 0.71). The incidence of positive presternal swabs was 15.6% in the morning compared to 9.1% in the afternoon (p = 0.18). About 90% of the germs detected were part of the natural skin flora (e.g., Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis). The incidence of sternal wound infections was 7.3% (morning) and 3.0% (afternoon) (p = 0.18). We did not find differences in the incidence of intraoperative bacterial sternal contamination, nor postoperative infections, between patients who underwent cardiac surgery in the morning or afternoon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.