ArticleBMC geriatrics2024
Prevalence and associated factors of preoperative abnormal electrocardiography among older surgical patients in southern Ethiopia: Multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of cardiac conditions from 12-lead electrocardiogram through natural language supervision.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of outpatient preanesthetic consultation on perioperative outcomes in 700 urological patients in a tertiary hospital: a retrospective observational study.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of abnormal electrocardiography (ECG) increases with aging, and these abnormalities may have an impact on anesthesia management. Although a normal ECG does not guarantee a healthy heart, an abnormal ECG can quickly identify a patient who is at high risk of cardiac complications.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and associated factors of preoperative abnormal electrocardiography among older surgical patients at selected teaching hospitals in southern Ethiopia, from February 15 to June 15, 2022. METHODOLOGY: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at three randomly selected teaching hospitals in southern Ethiopia on 246 elderly surgical patients recruited consecutively. Data were entered into Epidata version 4.6, then exported and analyzed in STATA version 16. A binary logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with abnormal ECG, and variables with a P-value < 0.2 were entered into the multivariate analysis to identify independent factors. Both crude and adjusted odds ratios were reported, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were presented using frequencies, tables, charts, and figures.
resultIn the current study, 120 (48.78%) of older surgical patients had abnormal preoperative ECGs. In terms of severity, 55.3% were classified as minor, while 44.16% were major ECG abnormalities. The most common ECG abnormalities were left axis deviation (LAD), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), and ST segment changes. The presence of comorbidity (AOR = 3.44, P = 0.001), age ≥ 70 years (AOR = 2.5, P = 0.011), history of angina (AOR = 5.9, P = 0.011), history of smoking (AOR = 5.07, P = 0.024) and urban residency (AOR = 1.89, P = 0.039) were the strongest risk factors for an abnormal ECG. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Our study shows that older patients are more likely to have an abnormal ECG before surgery, regardless of symptoms or risk factors. Therefore, it is suggested that all older patients undergo preoperative ECG screening. Further prospective cohort studies are needed to investigate the impact and outcome of patients with preoperative abnormal ECG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.