Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498442›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2024

An

Gagandeep Singh, Md Alamgir Hossain, Dhurgham Al-Fahad, Vandana Gupta, Smriti Tandon, Hemant Soni, Cheemalapati Venkata Narasimhaji, Mariusz Jaremko, Abdul-Hamid Emwas, Md Jamir Anwar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. In Vitro Anti-Breast Cancer Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gagandeep SinghSection of Microbiology, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India, 284003.
Md Alamgir HossainDepartment of Pharmacy, Jagannath University, 9, 10 Chittaranjan Ave, Dhaka, 1100, Bangladesh.
Dhurgham Al-FahadDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq.
Vandana GuptaDepartments of Microbiology, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi, 110021, India.
Smriti TandonSection of Microbiology, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India, 284003.
Hemant SoniSection of Microbiology, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India, 284003.
Cheemalapati Venkata NarasimhajiSection of Microbiology, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India, 284003.
Mariusz JaremkoSmart-Health Initiative (SHI) and Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul-Hamid EmwasCore Labs, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Md Jamir AnwarDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51542, Saudi Arabia.
Faizul AzamDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51452, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the number of patients infected by multi-drug-resistant bacteria have increased significantly over the past decade. This study follows a computational approach to identify potential antibacterial compounds from wild mushrooms. Twenty-six known compounds produced by wild mushrooms were docked to assess their affinity with drug targets of antibiotics such as penicillin-binding protein-1a (PBP1a), DNA gyrase, and isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (ILERS). Docking scores were further validated by multiple receptor conformer (MRC)-based docking studies. Based on the MRC-based docking results, eight molecules were shortlisted for ADMET analysis. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were further performed to evaluate the conformational stability of the ligand-protein complexes. Binding energies were computed by the gmx_MMPBSA method. The data were obtained in terms of root-mean square deviation, and root-mean square fluctuation justified the stability of Austrocortilutein A, Austrocortirubin, and Confluentin in complex with several proteins under physiological conditions. Among these, Austrocortilutein A displayed better binding affinity with PBP1a and ILERS when compared with their respective reference ligands. This study is preliminary and aims to help drive the search for compounds that have the capacity to overcome the anti-microbial resistance of prevalent bacteria, using natural compounds produced by wild mushrooms. Further experimental validation is required to justify the clinical use of the studied compounds.

Indexed as

Anti-microbial resistanceMolecular dockingMolecular dynamicsMulti-drug resistanceMushroom compounds

Identifiers

PMID39498442
PMCPMC11532805

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.