ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Development of fully automated models for staging liver fibrosis using non-contrast MRI and artificial intelligence: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal artificial intelligence models for liver fibrosis staging: a scoping review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Development of a hybrid deep learning-based framework for liver fibrosis classification using ultrasound images.iLIVER · 2026Article
- Emerging Role of MRI-Based Artificial Intelligence in Individualized Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence applications for managing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Current status and future prospects.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): Mechanisms, Clinical Implications and Therapeutic Advances.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Review
- Multi-model applications and cutting-edge advancements of artificial intelligence in hepatology in the era of precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence technology in the precision diagnosis and treatment of gastroenterology and hepatology: Innovative applications and challenges.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Beyond the BMI Paradox: Unraveling the Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Metabolic Health in Obesity.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Nutrients as epigenetic modulators in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.World journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Aortic atherosclerosis evaluation using deep learning based on non-contrast CT: A retrospective multi-center study.iScience · 2025Article
- [Fatigue in the general population: results of the "German Health Update 2023" study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate staging of liver fibrosis (LF) is essential for clinical management in chronic liver disease. While non-contrast MRI (NC-MRI) yields valuable information for liver assessment, its effectiveness in predicting LF remains underexplored. This study aimed to develop and validate artificial intelligence (AI)-powered models utilizing NC-MRI for staging LF. Methods: A total of 1726 patients from Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, registered between October 2003 and October 2022, were retrospectively collected, and divided into development (n = 1208) and internal test (n = 518) cohorts. An external test cohort consisting of 337 individuals from six centers, registered between June 2015 and November 2022, were also included. All participants underwent NC-MRI (T1-weighted imaging, T1WI; and T2-fat-suppressed imaging, T2FS) and liver biopsies. Two classification models (CMs), named T1 and T2FS, were trained on respective image types using 3D contextual transformer networks and evaluated on both test cohorts. Additionally, three CMs-Clinic, Image, and Fusion-were developed using clinical features, T1 and T2FS scores, and their integration via logistic regression. Classification effectiveness of CMs was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A comparison was conducted between the optimal models (OMs) with highest AUC and other methods (transient elastography, five serum biomarkers, and six radiologists). Findings: Fusion models (i.e., OM) yielded the highest AUC among the CMs, achieving AUCs of 0.810 for significant fibrosis, 0.881 for advanced fibrosis, and 0.918 for cirrhosis in the internal test cohort, and 0.808, 0.868, and 0.925, respectively, in the external test cohort. The OMs demonstrated superior performance in AUC, significantly surpassing transient elastography (only for staging ≥ F2 and ≥ F3 grades), serum biomarkers, and three junior radiologists for staging LF. Radiologists, with the aid of the OMs, can achieve a higher AUC in LF assessment. Interpretation: AI-powered models utilizing NC-MRI, including T1WI and T2FS, accurately stage LF. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071885); General Program of the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (LJKMZ20221160); Liaoning Province Science and Technology Joint Plan (2023JH2/101700127); the Leading Young Talent Program of Xingliao Yingcai in Liaoning Province (XLYC2203037).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.