ArticleUrology research & practice2024
Hounsfield Unit on Preoperative Computed Tomography as an Indicator of Prognosis in Patients with Liposarcoma.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Liposarcoma (LPS) is classified into 4 subtypes. As some subtypes have a high recurrence rate, knowing the risk of recurrence before surgery is important. Here, we aimed to investigate the relationship between Hounsfield units (HU) derived from preoperative computed tomography (CT) and the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery. Materials and Methods: We included 32 patients who underwent surgery for LPS between 2014 and 2022. Preoperative plain CT images were collected, and the HU value of each LPS was measured. The association between 2 HU categories (HU < cut-off vs. ≥ cut-off) and clinical variables was assessed. The optimal cut-off value was determined using statistical methods. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to determine the differences between the 2 HU categories at 2 endpoints: recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The dedifferentiated subtype showed significantly higher HU values than the other subtypes (P < .001). The optimal cut-off value for HU was 20. HU < 20 was associated with young age, low-performance status, low Charlson Comorbidity Index, and well-differentiated pathology. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that RFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with HU ≥ 20 than in those with HU < 20 (P = .007 and .04, respectively). However, when stratified based on subtype, no significant differences were observed between dedifferentiated and other subtypes. Conclusion: HU ≥ 20 on preoperative CT was associated with poor prognosis in LPS patients. Our findings suggest that preoperative CT-derived HU values may serve as useful predictors of prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.